Socialize

FacebookTwitter

Hyrbyair’s fresh stance on Balochistan

By Anwar Sajidi

Nawabzada Hyrbyair Marri has been resident abroad for a long period. For the last four years he has lived in London. Two years ago, at the behest of the government of Pakistan, cases had been registered against him and Faiz Baloch, but they were exonerated by the courts. However the British government has restricted their travel abroad. Hyrbyair Marri claims that he is working as the Baloch representative or ambassador to the outside world. There is no doubt that Nawabzada Hyrbryair and his family have always played an important role in the Baloch national movement. His elder brother, Mir Balach was martyred during the struggle. Nawab saheb [Nawab Khair Bakhsh Marri] himself has been occupied in the struggle continuously since his release from jail in 1978. During the 1980s he emigrated to Afghanistan but after the dissolution of the Soviet Union his exile, and that of thousands of members of his Marri tribe, could not prove fruitful. In 1992 he returned from Afghanistan because his life was under threat from Dostum’s Jowzjani militia.

On return, Nawab saheb launched a movement, Baloch Haq ‘Twar, but he was unable to develop it to any significance. He did state clearly however that he has nothing to do with Pakistan, its politics, and its institutions – even though he has participated in general elections during 1956-1962 and 1971.

During his arrest in the Justice Nawaz case, when the Baloch movement was quite weak, Mir Balach stepped forward and gave the movement support. Articles on the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) that were written by Pakistani and foreign journalists on the Internet had claimed that Balach Marri was the head of BLA. According to these articles, BLA was formed during the Gorbachev period, but after the dissolution of the Soviet Union Britain, and to a lesser extent the United States, were taking interest in it. But the fate of Balach Marri proved that he did not enjoy any major international support. It was seen however that after the martyrdom of Balach Marri the resistance movement in the Marri became weak to the point that it more or less ceased completely. After the death of Balach, Nawab saheb had said to his visitors that the movement now needs Hyrbyair. But Hyrbyair preferred to stay in England. He is the first person who has made significant efforts to introduce the Baloch national movement at the international level. He met members of the British Parliament, sent memoranda to the European Union member countries, and organized a number of seminars. Yet indications are that his return is not possible under present conditions.

For some time now Nawabzada Hyrbyair Marri has been expressing his views in interviews on Pakistani electronic media. For some time now his language had been unequivocal and harsh. But two days ago, in the interview he gave to Geo TV’s Sana Bucha, although his apparent position was unchanged his conversation lacked the “rhythm” that was there earlier [see press coverage]. In his last interview he had said that ending the occupation of Balochistan and withdrawal were the only issues that could be discussed with the rulers of Pakistan, but in his new interview he announced in no uncertain terms that he believed in the solution of the Balochistan issue through negotiations. He justified this on the grounds that he was doing this to prevent bloodshed. Although he said that the basic topic of negotiations would be independence, but the stress was not on the word independence.

In another newspaper interview Hyrbyair had revealed that there were differences among the movements in favour of independence. He did not elaborate on who the parties were among whom there were these differences. A number of questions have arisen from his ambiguous statement because at this time the Baloch national front (BNF) is working on the political front. BNF includes BRP [Baloch Republican Party], BNM [Baloch National Movement], BSO Azad, and Marri Ittehad [Anjuman Ittehad-e-Marri], while Nawabzada Mir Brahamdagh Khan Buti and Dr. Mir Allah Nazar are leading the resistance movement as field commanders. The question is among whom are these differences? Between Hyrbyair and Brahamdagh, or between Dr. Allah Nazar and him? Is BNM’s point of view different from his? These questions can only be answered by Hyrbyair.

In any event, as I wrote some months ago, the Baloch issue is about to enter an important stage. That stage has come. The Zardari government is engaged in negotiations behind the scenes or through “backdoor channels”. These contacts are taking place in Dubai, London, and Kabul. At the same time they are being denied. Whatever the result, something is happening. If something is happening then the respected leaders should take the Baloch nation into confidence. If they are engaged in secret negotiations then they should communicate what is the subject of these negotiations? On what terms are the discussions taking place? If they deny it, then they should make a formal announcement so there is no ambiguity surrounding this.

Whatever the case may be, the Baloch have seen such rises and falls in their history. They have been struggling for two thousand years to preserve their identity. In this long history many leaders came and went away. Some remained steadfast, some lost their footing, some were martyred, and some escaped from the battlefield. But the Baloch people continued along only one path. Their steps never faltered. Although leaders have an important role to play in struggles for national preservation, they are not more important than the nation. Whoever leads a struggle, supports it, or sacrifices for it, doesn’t do anyone a favour; each one has his role to play.

The time has come when Mir Brahmdagh, Dr. Allah Nazar, and Asa Zafar [BNM] explain fully the situation and reveal the reality to the nation. This is what will be the best for the movement.

(The writer is the Executive Editor of Daily Intekhab, Quetta and this article originally appeared in Urdu in Daily Intekhab on 15 Jan 2010. The views expressed by the writer are his own and the Baloch Hal team may not necessarily agree with the views expressed by the writer)

9 Responses to Hyrbyair’s fresh stance on Balochistan

  1. saif baloch

    January 16, 2010 at 7:59 pm

    i personally dont agree with the concerns expressed by sajadi. i watched the whole interview of him and he spoke out brilliantly on the balochistan issue. he surely agreed on the negotiations with the men in power of pakistan but on the agenda on the sole ponit of INDEPENDENCE…..so we balochs dont need to mistrust the leaders so quickly.

  2. Che Baloch

    January 17, 2010 at 5:36 pm

    I watched the interview and I am not sure how Mr. Sajidi came to the finding that Harybair has changed his stance on balochistan issue. Mr. Marri was being politie to the lady taking the interview just like any cultured human being will be and offcourse at the end of the day all battles whether won or lost are solved through negotiations but in his statement the Commander has no where compromised the freedom of Balochistan. Secondly, the Baloch Nation is ready to talk like cultured human beings on the issue of its independence with those in powers. I don’t see whats wrong in that?

    On the other hand may be Mr. Sajidi might have got used to watching people with pathetic morals and behaviors like the Govt and hence was expecting somethings same from Harybair.

  3. Gwaraam Baloch

    January 17, 2010 at 5:52 pm

    I agree with you, By propaganda you can not break the trust, If Mr. Hali sale him self Baloch nation withdrew her support, If some one like Hali sale him self nation will do same, even if get chance can ………*

    Mr. Sajidi must be question regarding this kind of article, what he wants?

  4. J Kalmati

    January 18, 2010 at 2:42 am

    Mr Sajidi i think you totalay miss-understood entire Interview, Hyrbyair still saying same thing he was saying since long time ago, Balochistan Will be a independent state no matter what, so why he want to negotiagte with a defeated army. Now Pakistani army should find a way for their own survial instead of policy of abduction and killing of Baloch people, from now on luck will be Baloch side inshallah whom were being tortured and killed since creation of Pakistan.

  5. Irfan Baloch

    January 18, 2010 at 5:54 pm

    I think You guys are being a bit harsh on Mr Sajidi. There is some truth to what he says. The word “negotiations” coming from Hairbyar itself points to a change in stance. No matter what you guys say Baloch are not yet ready for independence. The infrastructure is not there. The lack of an educated elite and of a substantial intellectual core is felt than ever before. What we need is a change in our own ranks. Mir Khair Bux Mari, Nawab Akbar Bugti, Shero Mari, Mir Ghaus Bux Bizenjo, some of these old guards were thinkers and some were good speakers who could get the point across, people listened when they talked. Who do we have now God forbid, Hasil Bizenjo, Tahir Bizenjo, Dr Malik and their likes. These poor folks cannot even negotiate a kilo of tomatoes let alone our rights. We need change from within. We need to pour hot water in the holes so the rats come out. It’s a tough road ahead and these folks won’t make it any easier for us.

  6. Che Baloch

    January 18, 2010 at 7:45 pm

    boo to such media puppets

  7. Irfan Baloch

    January 19, 2010 at 4:39 am

    It would be much better to involve ourselves in constructive discussions than labeling and stereotyping people my good brother Che. Before we go about calling people names, we should think hard about the hard work brother Siraj has done in putting together this wonderful website for us.. It would be very foolish on our parts if we do not show any tolerance to different point of views. To be a good speaker one first and foremost be a good listener.. if we we are not even willing to listen how could we get our point across and how could we get other people to listen to us. Please lets not ruin this site by calling each other names. Lets be an example for our youth. This is the least we can do.. LETS TALK

  8. J Kalmati

    January 19, 2010 at 6:25 am

    The biggest fault in the this site: there should not be commnets section on each daily news, only on editorials and articles like this one, second of all this website should stop using words like micreants and terrorist to Baloch sarmachars and their reactions against Pakistani state backed terrorism against Baloch People, otherwise this online English News source is excellent well orgnised news source, i rather visit balochhal than any other pakistani news media who represent only onside of story.

  9. Maj(r)Nasrat Baloch

    January 19, 2010 at 6:30 am

    Irfan Baloch: I really appreciate your comments here. Nice and mature thinking.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>